This is not something that feminists at Google alone are guilty of doing. The voices of those who object to feminism and its ideology are blocked, stymied and undermined by many organisations throughout the western world. One only has to recall the fiasco that was created at Harvard when Professor Lawrence Summers dared to suggest that men and women might differ in their approach to science to see that feminists do not like certain ideas being discussed.

I do not have the time to explain the various battles that I am currently undertaking over this at the moment, but we cannot have large companies thwarting the attempts of men to develop their websites - or, indeed, their charitable groups etc etc.

Without being able to generate sufficient funding, men's websites, men's groups and, hence, men's voices will remain very small. 

At some stage, of course, the funding will start to come through. But at the moment, this is still being heavily thwarted by thousands of feminist-indoctrinated women who see it as their feminist 'duty' to prevent men's issues from being aired. One only has to witness how, for example, they swarm like insects on Amazon to denigrate any book or person that criticises the feminist agenda.

And when it comes to the various machinations of companies that can impact hugely on political debate and the spread of information, it is extremely important to keep a very close eye on them.

Of course, as a private company, many people believe that Google should be able to do what it likes, but, in fact, I do not accept this. It is far too powerful to be allowed to influence political debate either by the simple - and hidden - manipulation of a few algorithms, or by the conscious denial of advertising revenue to specific groups whose ideas do not happen to be consistent with the agenda of some of its employees.

For example, Google could easily ensure that any page containing the words "men's rights" was demoted in its search engine - or, perhaps, completely taken out of sight. It could, for example, ensure that all pages that mentioned George Bush are promoted upwards in the search hierarchy if those pages also contain derogatory remarks, but are demoted if they contain positive remarks.

In other words, even simple algorithmic tweaks by Google could have a huge impact on the way that people think. As such, it is in all our interests that Google is brought to heel and closely scrutinised to ensure that it does not interfere with the democratic process - which, clearly, it is doing at the moment.

Furthermore, it is not just hostility towards black people for which Google gives support and provides funding. Jews and gays will also find that Google makes a profit from - and provides funding for - web space that is used to stir up hatred toward them.

Of course, Google will argue that they do this because they are supportive of 'free speech' - no matter what that speech might be. The truth, however, is that this is a lie. Google is using its huge resources to help undermine certain ideas - in this case those that are not consistent with its feminist employees - while at the same time supporting those who stir up hatred towards minority groups. And so for those men who are members of minority groups, this is a 'double whammy'.

As such, I would urge all male writers - particularly those in minority groups - to be very aware of the heavy prejudice that Google is stoking up against them, and to keep raising this matter with their readers in order to raise their consciousness over this issue.

Finally, given that Google supports sites wherein people claim that 'ni*gers stink', that 'Jews are worse than Nazis' and that 'faggots should be castrated', the statement by the founders of Google that its employees should do good not evil is clearly nothing more than a deceitful ploy to curry favour with the public.